STEPHENSON v. ELLIS

Filing 136

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 135 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the active docket of the court. In the event the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within 60 days, to reinstate the case. Clerk is directed to close the file in this case for administrative purposes. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 05/25/2017. (MB)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION CLARENCE FRANK STEPHENSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:11cv455-RV-CJK GIELOW, et al., Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated April 25, 2017 (doc. 135). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. of the court. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the active docket Page 2 of 2 3. In the event the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within 60 days, to reinstate the case. 4. The clerk is directed to close the file in this case for administrative purposes, and upon the expiration of 60 days without activity, the clerk is directed to close the case for all purposes. DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of May, 2017. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:11cv455-RV-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?