BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction, as petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to proceed under that section. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 3/18/2014. (sdw)
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
LINNETH ROSE BROWN,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. 3:11cv479/RV/CJK
Respondent.
______________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated February 12, 2014 (doc. 13). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the
Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to
Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely
filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed,
I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by
reference in this order.
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 1) is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction, as petitioner has not demonstrated
entitlement to proceed under that section.
3.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of March, 2014.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?