BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction, as petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to proceed under that section. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 3/18/2014. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION LINNETH ROSE BROWN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 3:11cv479/RV/CJK Respondent. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated February 12, 2014 (doc. 13). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction, as petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to proceed under that section. 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of March, 2014. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?