JACOBS v. GIELOW et al

Filing 175

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 165 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' 123 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claim against Defendant Gielow, and Defendant Gielow is therefore DIS MISSED from this action; is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Hall regarding his removal of plaintiff's clothing; is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for compensatory and punitive damages; is DENIED as to Plaintiff's excessive force claims against Defendants Hall and Davis. This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 3/7/2014. (djb)

Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION

JARVEY JACOBS, JR.,
Plaintiff,

vs.

Case No. 3:11cv520/LAC/EMT

WALTER GIELOW, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________/

ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated January 22, 2014 (doc. 165). The parties have been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo
determination of objections filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections
thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.
2.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s

claim against Defendant Gielow, and Defendant Gielow is therefore DISMISSED from this
action.

Page 2 of 2
3.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s

claim against Defendant Hall regarding his removal of Plaintiff’s clothing.
4.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s

claims for compensatory and punitive damages.
5.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s

excessive force claims against Defendants Hall and Davis.
6.

This matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further action.

ORDERED on this 7th day of March, 2014.

s/L.A. Collier
Lacey A. Collier
Senior United States District Judge

Case No.: 3:11cv520/LAC/EMT