JOINER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
12
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 11 Report and Recommendation. The respondent's 9 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 7 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice, as petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to proceed under that section. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 7/3/2012. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
JIMMY W. JOINER,
Petitioner,
vs.
Case No. 3:11cv554/RV/CJK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
________________________________________________________________
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated May 29, 2012. (Doc. 11). The parties have been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have
made a de novo determination of objections filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed
objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
The respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 9) is GRANTED.
3.
The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. §
2241 (doc. 7) is DISMISSED with prejudice, as petitioner has not demonstrated
entitlement to proceed under that section.
4.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of July, 2012.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:11cv554/RV/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?