HILLS v. TUCKER

Filing 38

ORDER ADOPTING 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ), challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Frederick Devon Hills, Escambia County, Fl orida, Circuit Court Case Number 08-CF-5451, is DENIED. Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. The clerk shall close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 9/8/2014. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION FREDERICK DEVON HILLS, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:12cv29/LC/CJK MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent. _________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated July 1, 2014. (Doc. 35). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 35) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging petitioner’s Page 2 of 2 judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Frederick Devon Hills, Escambia County, Florida, Circuit Court Case Number 08-CF-5451, is DENIED. 3. Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. 4. The clerk shall close the file. 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. ORDERED on this 8th day of September, 2014. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:12cv29/LC/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?