HILLS v. TUCKER
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ), challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Frederick Devon Hills, Escambia County, Fl orida, Circuit Court Case Number 08-CF-5451, is DENIED. Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. The clerk shall close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 9/8/2014. (sdw)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
FREDERICK DEVON HILLS,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 3:12cv29/LC/CJK
MICHAEL D. CREWS,
Respondent.
_________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated July 1, 2014. (Doc. 35). The parties have been furnished a
copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No
objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that
the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 35) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging petitioner’s
Page 2 of 2
judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Frederick Devon Hills,
Escambia County, Florida, Circuit Court Case Number 08-CF-5451, is DENIED.
3. Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.
4. The clerk shall close the file.
5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
ORDERED on this 8th day of September, 2014.
s /L.A.
Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:12cv29/LC/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?