PENTON v. TUCKER

Filing 26

ORDER adopting 23 Report and Recommendation. The resp's 17 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging pet's judgment of conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. K enneth Tarrell Penton in the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Florida, Case No. 05-1572, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on May 30, 2013. (kvg)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION KENNETH TARRELL PENTON, Petitioner, vs. 3:12cv176/RV/CJK MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent. ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated April 19, 2013. The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 17) is GRANTED. 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging petitioner’s judgment of conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. Kenneth Tarrell Penton in the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Florida, Case No. 05-1572, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Page 2 of 2 DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of May, 2013. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:12cv176/RV/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?