POWELL v. TUCKER et al
Filing
9
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 6 Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), this cause is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff's initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of the $350.00 filing fee in its entirety. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/6/2012. (djb)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
KEITH J. POWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.: 3:12cv189/MCR/EMT
KENNETH TUCKER, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated April 30, 2012 (doc. 6). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the
Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo
determination of the plaintiff’s objections, which the court deems timely filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, as well as the plaintiff’s
objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), this cause is DISMISSED without
prejudice to Plaintiff’s initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of the
$350.00 filing fee in its entirety.
3.
All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.
4.
The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of June, 2012.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?