STUPAR v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA
Filing
54
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 47 Report and Recommendation. The 6 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging petitioner's convictions, sentences and revocation of probation in Okaloosa County Circuit Court Case No. 08-CF-2015, is DENIED. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 1/6/2014. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
MARK STUPAR,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 3:12cv391/LC/CJK
MICHAEL D. CREWS,
Respondent.
____________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated November 22, 2013. (Doc. 47). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed
objections, thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 47) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 6) challenging
petitioner’s convictions, sentences and revocation of probation in Okaloosa County
Circuit Court Case No. 08-CF-2015, is DENIED.
3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
4. The Clerk is directed to close the file.
5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
ORDERED on this 6th day of January, 2014.
s/L.A. Collier
Lacey A. Collier
Senior United States District Judge
Case No: 3:12cv391/LC/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?