JOHNSON v. CREWS
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Respondents motion to dismiss (doc. 19 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on November 8, 2013. (pmc)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
ZEDERRICK O. JOHNSON,
Petitioner,
vs.
Case No. 3:12cv392/RV/CJK
MICHAEL D. CREWS,
Respondent.
____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated October 7, 2013. (Doc. 22). The parties have been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have
made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto
timely filed (doc. 23), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 22) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 19) is GRANTED.
3. Petitioner’s habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 1) is
DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
4. The Clerk is directed to close the file.
5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2013.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:12cv392/RV/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?