VAUGHN v. 21ST CENTURY SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 27

ORDER - The magistrate judge's 13 Report and Recommendation regarding the motion to dismiss (doc. 6 ) is adopted. Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part as to Counts II, III, IV, and IV of the Compl aint, and DENIED in part as to Count I of the Complaint. Defendant 21st Century Security Insurance Company has filed an answer (doc. 24 ). The case is hereby referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings and entry of an initial scheduling order. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/25/2013. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION GERALD VAUGHN, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:12cv410/MCR/CJK 21ST CENTURY SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________ ORDER Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on October 16, 2012 (doc. 13), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any,1 the Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 13) regarding the motion to dismiss (doc. 6) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 6) is GRANTED in part as to Counts II, III, IV, and IV of the Complaint, and DENIED in part as to Count I of the Complaint. 3. Defendant 21st Century Security Insurance Company has filed an answer (doc. 24). The case is hereby referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings 1 No timely objections have been filed. Page 2 of 2 and entry of an initial scheduling order. DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2013. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:12cv410/MCR/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?