MALONE v. CREWS

Filing 18

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 16 Report and Recommendation. The 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is GRANTED, and this habeas action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/7/2013. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION JOHN HORACE MALONE, Petitioner, v. Case No.: 3:12cv540/MCR/EMT MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent. _________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated May 6, 2013 (doc. 16). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely objections have been filed.1 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The motion to dismiss (doc. 12) is GRANTED, and this habeas action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 1 The court notes that Petitioner filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit from “the final judgm ent of an order (Report and Recom m endation).” (Doc. 17). This attem pted appeal was prem ature because the Report and Recom m endation is not a final order, and in any event, the court has found no basis for granting a certificate of appealability. Page 2 of 2 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of June, 2013. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:12cv540/MCR/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?