CRENSHAW et al v. CITY OF DEFUNIAK SPRINGS et al

Filing 76

AMENDED ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 72 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 61 Motion for Default Judgement [sic] and 69 Amended Motion for Default Judgment [sic] are DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/29/2013. (djb)

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
TIMOTHY CRENSHAW
and HELEN L. CRENSHAW,
Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No. 3:13cv50/MCR/EMT

CITY OF DEFUNIAK SPRINGS, et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________________/
AMENDED ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated July 8, 2013. (Doc. 63). The parties have been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de
novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Additionally, Plaintiffs’ “Amended Motion for Default Judgement [sic]” (doc. 69) does not
correct the legal insufficiencies identified by the magistrate judge in the Report and
Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.
2.

Plaintiffs’ “Motion for Default Judgement [sic]” and “Amended Motion for

Default Judgment [sic]” (docs. 61, 69) are DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2013.
s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE