Filing 82

ORDER adopting the magistrate judges 72 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 68 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 8/9/2013. (djb)

Download PDF
CRENSHAW et al v. CITY OF DEFUNIAK SPRINGS et al Doc. 82 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION TIMOTHY CRENSHAW and HELEN L. CRENSHAW, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:13cv50/MCR/EMT CITY OF DEFUNIAK SPRINGS, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated July 25, 2013. (Doc. 72). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiffs’ “Motion for Default Judgement [sic]” (doc. 68) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2013. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?