DOBIE v. SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 5 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Jermaine Marlon Dobie, Walton County, Florida, Circuit Court Case Number 05-CF-931, is DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/04/2015. (MB)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JERMAINE M. DOBIE,
Case No. 3:13cv277-MCR-CJK
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated July 1, 2015. (ECF No. 26). The parties have been furnished a
copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). In particular, the
Court has considered Petitioner’s initial objections (ECF No. 31) and his amended objection
(ECF No. 32), which he sought leave to file by motion that the Court herewith grants. The
Court has made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto
timely filed, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 26) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 5), challenging the
judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Jermaine Marlon Dobie, Walton
County, Florida, Circuit Court Case Number 05-CF-931, is DENIED, and the Clerk is
directed to close the file.
Page 2 of 2
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2015.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?