STROUT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Filing 8

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 7 Report and Recommendation. The 6 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and the clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR on 9/23/2013. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION DUANE V. STROUT, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:13cv314/LC/CJK STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Respondents. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated August 12, 2013. (Doc. 7). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Page 2 of 2 2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 6) is DISMISSED for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and the clerk is directed to close the file. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of September, 2013. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:13cv314/LC/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?