PIETA v. USAA GROUP
Filing
8
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 7 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/19/2013. (djb)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
DENNIS R. PIETA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.: 3:13cv322/MCR/EMT
USAA GROUP and
USAA INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. OF TEXAS,
Defendants.
_________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated June 17, 2013 (doc. 7). The parties have been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1).
No timely
objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
Defendants’ Motion and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss (doc.
4) is GRANTED.
3.
This action is DISMISSED, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, for Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2013.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?