HARTLEY v. WAITMAN et al

Filing 16

AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's motion for remand (doc. 6 ) and Amended and or Supplemental Motion to Remand (doc. 13 ) are DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 10/8/2013. (sdw)

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
DREW C. HARTLEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No. 3:13cv469/LAC/EMT

G. WAITMAN, et. al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
AMENDED ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated September 5, 2013 (doc. 7). The parties have been furnished a copy of the
Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to
Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the
arguments raised in Plaintiff’s “Amended and or Supplemental Motion to Remand” (doc. 13).
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and
Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.
2.

Plaintiffs’ motion for remand (doc. 6) and “Amended and or Supplemental Motion

to Remand” (doc. 13) are DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of October, 2013.

s /L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE