BROWN v. COMERFORD et al
Filing
25
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 24 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's individual capacity claims for nominal damages against defendants Gielow, Suttles, Enfinger, Carr and Moore are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJ UDICE for plaintiffs failure to comply with an order of the court. All other claims were dismissed on July 21, 2014 (doc. 21 ). The clerk shall enter judgment according to this Order and the court's July 21, 2014 Order (doc. 21 ), and shall close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 10/21/2014. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
JOE BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:13cv572/LC/CJK
RICHARD COMERFORD, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated September 19, 2014 (doc. 24). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1)(B). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 24) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
Plaintiff’s individual capacity claims for nominal damages against
Page 2 of 2
defendants Gielow, Suttles, Enfinger, Carr and Moore are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order of the court. All other
claims were dismissed on July 21, 2014 (doc. 21).
3. The clerk shall enter judgment according to this Order and the court’s July
21, 2014 Order (doc. 21), and shall close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2014.
s /L.A.
Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:13cv572/LC/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?