HALL v. MOORE et al
Filing
47
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 43 Report and Recommendation. Defendants 34 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Defendants Hood, Gielow and Thornhill shall file an answer to the third amended complaint within 14 days from the date of this order. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/19/2015. (W T GIELOW, L HOOD and R B THORNHILL answer due 7/6/2015.) (djb)
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
ANDREW DAVID HALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:14cv140/MCR/CJK
C.O. MOORE., et al.,
Defendants.
______________________/
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
filed on May 15, 2015 (doc. 43), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing
any timely objections to the Recommendation, the Recommendation is adopted as the
opinion of the Court.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 43) is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Defendants Hood, Gielow and Thornhill’s motion to dismiss (doc. 34) is DENIED.
3. Defendants Hood, Gielow and Thornhill shall file an answer to the third amended
complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order.
4. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of June, 2015.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?