REUTCKE v. HOLMES et al
Filing
6
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 6/23/2014. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
JOHN T. REUTCKE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 3:14cv267/LAC/CJK
SHERIFF WENDELL HOLMES, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated June 13, 2014 (doc. 4). Defendant has been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). I have made a de novo
determination of the timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious under 28
U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process.
Page 2 of 2
3. The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of June, 2014.
s /L.A.
Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:14cv267/LC/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?