REUTCKE v. HOLMES et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 6/23/2014. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION JOHN T. REUTCKE, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:14cv267/LAC/CJK SHERIFF WENDELL HOLMES, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 13, 2014 (doc. 4). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process. Page 2 of 2 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of June, 2014. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:14cv267/LC/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?