MANDELBAUM et al v. DISANTO
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING 30 chief magistrate judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION dated 5/5/2017. The chief magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. Plaintiff's r equest to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§§ 1391(b)(2) and 1404(a) (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division for all further proceedings. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 8/8/2017. (alb)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
EDWARD MANDELBAUM
and BARRY RELL,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Case No: 3:14cv461/RV/EMT
PATRICK DISANTO,
Defendant.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated May 5, 2017 (ECF No. 30). Plaintiffs’ have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed
objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
Plaintiffs’ request to transfer venue, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)(2)
and 1404(a) (ECF No. 29), is GRANTED, and this case is TRANSFERRED to the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, for
all further proceedings.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2017.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No.: 3:14cv461/RV/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?