BATTLES v. CREWS et al
Filing
38
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 37 Report and Recommendation. Defendant Foskey's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk is also direc ted to enter judgment DISMISSING plaintiff's claims against defendants Crews, Whitehurst, Myers, Asencio and Carter according to the November 15, 2015 Order, ECF No. 15 . The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/28/2016. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
JOHNNIE L. BATTLES,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:14cv521/MCR/CJK
PAULA FOSKEY,
Defendant.
______________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated November 28, 2016. ECF No. 37. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No timely objections have been filed. After reviewing the Report and
Recommendation and the record, the Court has determined that the Report and
Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 37, is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2
2. Defendant Foskey’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 28, is
GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
3. The Clerk is also directed to enter judgment DISMISSING plaintiff's claims
against defendants Crews, Whitehurst, Myers, Asencio and Carter according to the
November 15, 2015 Order, ECF No. 15.
4. The Clerk shall close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of December, 2016.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:14cv521/MCR/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?