GIBSON v. HOLDER
ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 31 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (ii). Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/23/2015. (djb)
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ERIC WILMER GIBSON,
Case No.: 3:14cv641/MCR/EMT
ERIC HOLDER, et al.,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated August 3, 2015. (Doc. 31). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo
determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state
a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of September 2015.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?