BRADLEY v. WIGGINS et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 10 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's federal claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 5/18/2015. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION RUSSELL WILLIAM BRADLEY, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:14cv653/LAC/EMT DAVID WIGGINS, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated April 16, 2015 (doc. 10). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff’s federal claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 3. Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. 4. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2015. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?