POLONCZYK v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION

Filing 31

ORDER adopting the Chief Magistrate Judge's 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's 14 second amended complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B)(ii). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 05/05/20/15. (MB)

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
KIM ANTHONY POLONCZYK,
Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No.: 3:15cv15/RV/EMT

TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated April 27, 2015 (doc. 28). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report
and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed
objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto
(doc. 30), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.
2.

Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (doc. 14) is DISMISSED for failure to state

a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
3.

All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4.

The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of May, 2015.

/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE