BRADLEY v. LEVIN et al
Filing
16
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 13 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's federal claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 7/7/2015. (djb)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
RUSSELL WILLIAM BRADLEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No. 3:15cv53/LAC/EMT
FRED GERSON LEVIN, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated June 12, 2015 (doc. 13). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report
and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and
Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by
reference in this order.
2. Plaintiff’s federal claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
3. Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
4. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2015.
s/L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?