WARD v. CREWS

Filing 19

ORDER adopting the magistrate judges 17 Report and Recommendation. The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and DENIED as stated in this order. The clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealbility is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 1/10/2017. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION SHARON FAYE WARD, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:15cv71/LC/CJK JULIE L. JONES, Respondent. _____________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated December 14, 2016. (Doc. 17). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto timely filed (Doc. 18), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 17) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging the judgment of conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. Sharon Faye Ward, Escambia County Circuit Court Case Nos. 10-CF-2749, 10-CF-3529 and 10-CF-3530, is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to the extent it challenges petitioner’s conviction in Case No. 10-CF-3529, and DENIED to the extent it challenges petitioner’s convictions in Case Nos. 10-CF-2749 and 10-CF-3530. 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. ORDERED on this 10th day of January, 2017. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:15cv71/LC/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?