WARD v. CREWS
ORDER adopting the magistrate judges 17 Report and Recommendation. The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and DENIED as stated in this order. The clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealbility is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 1/10/2017. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SHARON FAYE WARD,
Case No. 3:15cv71/LC/CJK
JULIE L. JONES,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated December 14, 2016. (Doc. 17). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an
objection has been made.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto
timely filed (Doc. 18), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 17) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging the judgment of
conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. Sharon Faye Ward, Escambia County
Circuit Court Case Nos. 10-CF-2749, 10-CF-3529 and 10-CF-3530, is DISMISSED
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to the extent it challenges petitioner’s
conviction in Case No. 10-CF-3529, and DENIED to the extent it challenges
petitioner’s convictions in Case Nos. 10-CF-2749 and 10-CF-3530.
3. The clerk is directed to close the file.
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
ORDERED on this 10th day of January, 2017.
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:15cv71/LC/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?