CARTER v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11 ) is DENIED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Carter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is also DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 3/17/2017. (sdw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION BRANDON CARTER, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:15cv142-LC/CAS SECRETARY, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent. _________________________/ ORDER This cause comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 19) dated February 6, 2017, recommending that Respondent’s motion to dismiss contained in its response (ECF No. 11) be denied and that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections (ECF No. 22). Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is DENIED. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Carter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is also DENIED. 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2017. s/ L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?