MALDONADO v. OBAMA et al
Filing
9
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 8 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/22/2015. (MB)
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
DAVID RAY MALDONADO,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:15cv334/MCR/EMT
BARACK OBAMA and
JACOB LEW,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated September 21, 2015. (Doc. 8). Plaintiff has been furnished a
copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de
novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.
Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
3.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of October 2015.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?