FLOYD v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Filing 22

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 20 Report and Recommendation. The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District courts. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/22/2017. (alb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION WILLIE FLOYD, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 3:15cv361-MCR/CAS FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration on the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge dated July 7, 2017. ECF No. 20. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 20, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DENIED. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2017. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:15cv361-MCR/CAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?