FLOYD v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Filing
22
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 20 Report and Recommendation. The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District courts. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/22/2017. (alb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
WILLIE FLOYD,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 3:15cv361-MCR/CAS
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.
_____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration on the Report and Recommendation
of the U.S. Magistrate Judge dated July 7, 2017. ECF No. 20. The parties have
been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded
an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed
objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 20, is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.
DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2017.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:15cv361-MCR/CAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?