LASSITER v. COLVIN
Filing
18
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 17 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff is hereby awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $3,566.55, to be paid by defendant Commissioner within a reasonable time of this order. Commissioner shall follow Astrue v. Ratliff, but make prompt payment of the amount due, as no showing of an outstanding federal debt has been made to date. Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 01/26/2017. (MB)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
CHERIE E. LASSITER,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:15cv406-LC-CJK
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated December 27, 2016 (doc. 17). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
Page 2 of 2
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
Plaintiff is hereby awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to
Justice Act in the amount of $3,566.55, to be paid by defendant Commissioner within
a reasonable time of this order.
3.
The Commissioner shall follow Astrue v. Ratliff, but make prompt
payment of the amount due, as no showing of an outstanding federal debt has been
made to date.
4.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2017.
s /L.A.
Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:15cv406-LC-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?