JOYCE v. JONES

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Daryl Lamont Joyce, Jr., Escambia County Circuit Court Case No. 09-CF-4118, is DENIED. The clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability be DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/22/2017. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION DARYL LAMONT JOYCE, JR., Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 3:15cv408/MCR/CJK FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, Respondent. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated May 25, 2017. ECF No. 15. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 15, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Daryl Lamont Joyce, Jr., Escambia County Circuit Court Case No. 09-CF-4118, is DENIED. 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 4. A certificate of appealability be DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2017. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:15cv408/MCR/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?