NELSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Filing 6

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 5 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious for Plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process. The clerk shall note on the docket that the dismissal of this action constitutes plaintiff's third strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/17/2015. (MB)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION KENNETH NELSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:15cv435/MCR/CJK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. / ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated October 16, 2015. (ECF No. 5). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious for Plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process. 3. The clerk shall note on the docket that the dismissal of this action constitutes plaintiff’s third strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 4. The clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of November, 2015. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?