RITCHIE v. JONES
Filing
18
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 14 ) is GRANTED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ), challenging petitioners judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Barbara Ann Ritchie, Santa Rosa County Circuit Court Case No. 07-CF-1307, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 12/20/2016. (MB)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
BARBARA RITCHIE,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 3:15cv495/LC/CJK
JULIE JONES,
Respondent.
___________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated November 18, 2016. (Doc. 17). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 17) is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 14) is GRANTED.
Page 2 of 2
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging petitioner’s
judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Barbara Ann Ritchie,
Santa Rosa County Circuit Court Case No. 07-CF-1307, is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
4. The clerk is directed to close the file.
5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
ORDERED on this 20th day of December, 2016.
s /L.A.
Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:15cv495/LC/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?