MITCHELL v. FIRST TRANSIT INC

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. That Defendant's motion to partially dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23 ) be GRANTED; That Plaintiff's claims of discrimination based upon color (independent of race ), age, and non-union status be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and That Plaintiff's failure to promote claims be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/10/2017. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION BRENDA ELAINE MITCHELL, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 3:15cv529/MCR/EMT FIRST TRANSIT, INC. d/b/a ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT, Defendant. _________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated April 24, 2017 (ECF No. 39). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Page 2 of 2 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendant’s motion to partially dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23) be GRANTED; 2. That Plaintiff’s claims of discrimination based upon color (independent of race), age, and non-union status be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and 3. That Plaintiff’s failure to promote claims be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of May 2017. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No.: 3:15-cv-529/MCR/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?