FELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 38

ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 36 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 32 Motion to Determine Reasonable Deposition Fee and for Attorney Fees is GRANTED to the extent that a fee in the total amount of $2,000 is deemed reasonable and sufficient to compensate Dr. Borom for matters related to his deposition in this cause. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 6/29/2017. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION WESLEY G. FELL, JR. Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 3:15cv541/MCR/EMT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. _________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 9, 2017. ECF No. 36. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Determine Reasonable Deposition Fee and for Attorney Fees, ECF No. 32, is GRANTED to the extent that a fee in the total amount of $2,000 is deemed reasonable and sufficient to compensate Dr. Borom for matters related to his deposition in this cause. DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of June 2017. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:15cv541/MCR/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?