SCOTT v. LANDY et al
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious and that Plaintiff be assessed a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/27/2017. (sdw)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
JOE HENRY SCOTT, III,
Inmate No. ECSO-00MNI-006285,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 3:15cv578/MCR/EMT
MARIA LANDY, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated August 28, 2017. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff has been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed
objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted.
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.
This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious and that Plaintiff be assessed a “strike” under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2017.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:15cv578/MCR/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?