Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING Magistrate Judges 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and GRANTING 20 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus 7 , is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/15/2017. (alb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION JUNE CORIELL, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:16cv10/MCR/CJK SECRETARY, DEPTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. __________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated May 10, 2017. ECF No. 28. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. See ECF No. 32. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 28, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 20, is GRANTED. 3. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 7, challenging petitioner’s judgment of conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. June Coriell, Santa Rosa County Circuit Court Case No. 09-CF-476, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. The Clerk is directed to close the file. 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of September, 2017. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No.3:16cv10/MCR/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?