MORRIS v. FLA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Filing 57

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's "Petition for Injunction to Enjoin State Court from Sentencing Petitioner Back to F.D.O.C. in Light of History of Official Abuse Evidenced by Pending United States District Court Case, and to Enjoin Future Imminent Acts of Abuse at the Hands of (those same Defendant) F.D.O.C. Officers" (doc. 48 ) is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 08/01/2017. (MB)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION CHARLES LITTON MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:16cv15-RV-CJK OFFICER DERRICK JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated July 3, 2017 (doc. 49). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff’s “Petition for Injunction to Enjoin State Court from Sentencing Petitioner Back to F.D.O.C. in Light of History of Official Abuse Page 2 of 2 Evidenced by Pending United States District Court Case, and to Enjoin Future Imminent Acts of Abuse at the Hands of (those same Defendant) F.D.O.C. Officers” (doc. 48) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of August, 2017. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:16cv15-RV-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?