MONTOYA v MORGAN et al

Filing 69

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 61 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' 54 Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 Against Plaintiff's Counsel is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/15/2017. (djb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAURA MONTOYA,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 3:16cv92-MCR-EMT

DAVID MORGAN, individually and
in his official capacity as SHERIFF,
ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA;
ERIC HAINES; RICKY SHELBY;
FRED ALFORD; ALLEN, NORTON
& BLUE, P.A.; J. WES GAY; and
DEBRA D. LITTLE,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of those portions to
which an objection has been made.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and any objections
thereto timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the Report and
Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Expenses Under 28
U.S.C. Section 1927 Against Plaintiff’s Counsel, ECF No. 54, is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December 2017.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-