BRIER et al v. DE CAY
Filing
67
ORDER. The magistrate judge's 62 Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Plaintiff's 60 Renewed Motion to Determine Amount of Attorneys' Fees and Costs is DENIED witho ut prejudice. Plaintiff's shall have a final opportunity to file a motion in compliance with the Courts Local Rules within 14 days of the date of this Order. Should Plaintiff's fail to timely comply, their motion will be denied with prejudice. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 1/22/2019. (alb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
JOHN BRIER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CASE NO. 3:16cv142-MCR-CJK
KEITH DE CAY,
Defendant.
___________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated October 19, 2018. ECF No. 62. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have
made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Determine Amount of Attorneys’ Fees and
Costs, ECF No. 60, is DENIED without prejudice.
3.
Plaintiffs shall have a final opportunity to file a motion in compliance
with the Court’s Local Rules within 14 days of the date of this Order. Should
Plaintiffs fail to timely comply, their motion will be denied with prejudice.
DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of January 2019.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:16cv142-MCR-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?