SHEFFIELD v. TUCKER
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious and that Plaintiff be assessed a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 01/05/2017. (MB)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
LANCE JAVON SHEFFIELD,
Inmate No. H18077,
CASE NO. 3:16cv204/MCR/EMT
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated December 12, 2016. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff has been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious and that Plaintiff be assessed a “strike” under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2017.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:16cv204/MCR/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?