ALEX v. BEAUCHAMP et al
Filing
20
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 18 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants' 15 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/18/2017. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
RICKY W. ALEX,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:16cv222-MCR-CJK
BRANDIE BEAUCHAMP, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated August 31, 2017 (doc. 18). The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). No timely objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and
Recommendation, and the record, the Court has determined that the Report and
Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 13) is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Page 2 of 2
3.
Defendants’ Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT.
DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of September, 2017.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:16cv222-MCR-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?