CADEJUSTE v. LOCKE ET AL
Filing
13
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), for Plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process. Pla intiff's second motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 8 ) and motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 9 ), as well as all other pending motions, are DENIED as moot. Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/22/2016. (MB)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
GIEUVOIS CADEJUSTE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 3:16cv465/MCR/CJK
MAILROOM SUPERVISOR LOCKE,
et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated December 12, 2016. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). After reviewing any timely objections to the Recommendation, the Court
has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 11, is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), for Plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process.
3. Plaintiff's second motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 8) and
motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 9), as well as all other pending motions, are
DENIED as moot.
4. The clerk shall close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2016.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:16cv465/MCR/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?