JACKSON v. JONES et al.

Filing 18

ORDER adopting the chief magistrate judge's 16 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 4/10/2017. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION JAMES LEE JACKSON, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 3:16cv551/RV/EMT JULIE L. JONES, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated March 22, 2017 (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto (doc. 17), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Page 2 of 2 3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of April, 2017. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No.: 3:16cv551/RV/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?