RITCHIE v. JONES

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 14 ) is GRANTED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ), challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in St ate of Florida v. Steven Gerrard Ritchie, Walton County Circuit Court Case No. 10-CF-755, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The clerk shall close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 12/5/2017. (sdw)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION STEVEN RITCHIE, Petitioner, v. Case No. 3:16cv597/LC/CJK JULIE JONES, Respondent. ________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated November 7, 2017 (doc. 17). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation, and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 17) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 14) is GRANTED. Page 2 of 2 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Steven Gerrard Ritchie, Walton County Circuit Court Case No. 10-CF-755, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. The clerk shall close the file. 5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. ORDERED on this 5th day of December, 2017. s/L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:16cv597/LC/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?