BLACKMAN v. PURIFOY CONSTRUCTION et al

Filing 43

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 33 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim for retaliation under Title VII against both defendan ts, and DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim for retaliation under the ADEA and discrimination under Title VII and the ADEA. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $7,500.00 for lost wages. The clerk is directed to CLOSE the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 2/13/2020. (mb)

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION

MARK BLACKMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 3:16cv625-RV-HTC

PURIFOY CONSTRUCTION, and
TYRONE PURIFOY,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (doc. 42). Having considered the Report and Recommendation
and allowing time for objections to be filed, I have determined that it should be
adopted. Accordingly, it is:
ORDERED that:
1.

The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 33) is
GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s claim for retaliation under Title VII
against both defendants, and DENIED as to Plaintiff’s claim for

Page 2 of 2

retaliation under the ADEA and discrimination under Title VII and the
ADEA.
3.

The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of the plaintiff
and against both defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of
$7,500.00 for lost wages.1

4.

The clerk is directed to CLOSE the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2020.

s/Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

According to Florida’s Division of Corporations, Purifoy Construction is listed as “inactive” and
was administratively dissolved on September 25, 2015.

1

3:16cv625-RV-HTC