SQUARE RING INC v. TROYANOVSKY
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING magistrate judge's 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The magistrate judge's 32 initial Report and Recommendation, is VACATED; andDefendant Troyanovsky's 33 Motion to Extend, is GRANTED. ( Dispositive Motions to be filed by 10/29/2018., Discovery due by 8/10/2018.) Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 4/23/2018. (alb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
SQUARE RING INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-641-MCR-GRJ
EDUARD TROYANOVSKY,
Defendant.
__________________________________/
ORDER
On April 4, 2018, the magistrate judge requested the Court to enter an
appropriate case management and scheduling order consistent with the deadlines in
his Report and Recommendation. See ECF No. 34. Defendant Eduard Troyanovsky
subsequently submitted a Letter to Magistrate Judge Jones, asking him to extend
various deadlines in his initial Report and Recommendation (the “Letter Motion”).
Troyanovsky explained that Square Ring did not oppose the extension. On April 6,
2018, the magistrate judge recommended granting Troyanovsky’s Letter Motion in
an Amended Report and Recommendation, see ECF No. 34, which he asked the
Court to adopt in place of his initial Report and Recommendation. No objections
were filed.
Case No. 3:16-cv-641-MCR-GRJ
Page 2 of 2
Having fully considered the Amended Report and Recommendation on the
unopposed Letter Motion, the Court has determined that the Amended Report and
Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge’s Amended Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 34,
is ADOPTED by the Court;
2. The magistrate judge’s initial Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 32, is
VACATED; and
3. Defendant Troyanovsky’s Motion to Extend, ECF No. 33, is GRANTED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of April 2018.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:16-cv-641-MCR-GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?