JACKSON v. COPPENGER et al

Filing 52

ORDER adopting Magistrate's 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 49 , is DENIED. This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings on Plaintiff's individual capacity Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants Coppenger and Shaw. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/28/2018. (MB)

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
STEVEN SEAN JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. 3:16cv644-MCR-CJK

J. COPPENGER, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated August 31, 2018. ECF No. 51. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

Page 2 of 2

2.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 49, is DENIED.

3.

This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further

pretrial proceedings on Plaintiff’s individual capacity Eighth Amendment claim
against Defendants Coppenger and Shaw.
DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of September 2018.

M. Casey Rodgers

s/
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:16cv644-MCR-CJK