HARRY v. NICHOLS et al
Filing
7
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED for the limited purpose of dismissing this action. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 2/21/2017. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
NAIL A. HARRY,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:16cv680-RV-CJK
M. NICHOLS, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated December 28, 2016 (doc. 4). The plaintiff has been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections
have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that
the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
Page 2 of 2
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is GRANTED
for the limited purpose of dismissing this action.
3.
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious.
4.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2017.
/s/ Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 3:16cv680-RV-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?